 |
Tibeto-Burman languages Totally Explained
|
|  |
|
NEW! |
All the latest news in the worlds of
computer gaming,
entertainment,
the environment,
finance,
health,
politics,
science,
stocks & shares,
technology
and much,
much,
more.
|
Everything about Tibeto-burman Languages totally explainedThe Tibeto-Burman family of languages (often considered a sub-group of the Sino-Tibetan language family) is spoken in various central and south Asian countries, including Myanmar (Burma), Tibet, northern Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, parts of central China ( Guizhou, Hunan), northern parts of Nepal,North-eastern parts of Bangladesh, Bhutan, western Pakistan ( Baltistan), and various regions of India ( Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, and both the Ladakh and Kargil regions of Jammu and Kashmir).
The subfamily includes approximately 350 languages; Burmese has the most speakers (approximately 32 million). Approximately 8 million Tibetans and related peoples speak one of several related Tibetan dialects or languages.
Recently George van Driem has advocated elevating "Tibeto-Burman" to displace "Sino-Tibetan" as the top-tier language family, with the Chinese languages (Sinitic) classified as a sub-branch within the Tibeto-Burman/Sino-Tibetan family. This proposal hasn't been widely accepted.
Classification
There have been two major classifications: Shafer (1966) and Benedict (1972). Since then, many languages previously inadequately documented have received more attention with the publication of new grammars, dictionaries, and wordlists. This new research has greatly benefited comparative work. Bradley (1997) is a newer classification that incorporates the newer data.
Bradley (1997)
I. Bodic (a.k.a. Western) » A. Bodish
: i. Central Bodish (a.k.a. Tibetan) » :: a. Western Tibetan
:: b. Central Tibetan » ::: i) Western
::: ii) mNgaẖris » ::: iii) gTsang
::: iv) dBus (a.k.a. 'Central' Central Tibetan) » ::: v) Southern Tibetan
:: c. Amdo Tibetan (a.k.a. Northeastern Tibetan) » :: d. Khams Tibetan (a.k.a. Southeastern Tibetan)
: ii. West Bodish (a.k.a. Gurung, Tamang) » : iii. East Bodish (a.k.a. Bumthang)
: iv. Tshangla (a.k.a. East Bodic) » : v. West Himalayish (a.k.a. Kanauri)
B. Himalayan » : i. Central
: ii. Kiranti
II. North-East India (a.k.a. Sal) » A. Bodo-Garo
: i. Northern Naga » B. Jinghpaw
C. Luish (a.k.a. Sak) » D. Pyu
III. Kuki-Chin » A. Southern Naga
B. Kuki » C. Chin
D. Arleng
IV. Central » A. Lepcha
B. Western Arunachal » C. Adi-Galo-Mishing-Nishi (a.k.a. Abor-Miri-Dafla, Tani group of people believed to be descendants of ABOTANI, first Human being)
D. Digarish 'Mishmi' » E. Keman 'Mishmi'
F. Rawang (a.k.a. Nungish)
V. North-Eastern
VI. South-Eastern » A. Burmese-Lolo (a.k.a. Burmic)
: i. Mru » : ii. Gong
: iii. Burmish » : iv. Loloish
:: a. Northern » :: b. Central
:: c. Southern » B. Karen
Benedict (1972)
A very influential classification (although tentative) is that of Benedict (1972). This was a collaborated effort of Paul Benedict and Robert Shafer (completed around 1942-1943) with editing by James Matisoff. This classification puts Tibeto-Burman under a larger Sino-Tibetan phylum:
» Sino-Tibetan
# Chinese » # Tibeto-Karen
#* Karen » #* Tibeto-Burman
The Tibeto-Burman sub-family is then composed of 7 main branches:
I. Tibetan-Kanauri (a.k.a. Bodish-Himalayish) » A. Bodish (in eastern & southern Tibet)
B. Himalayish » : i. "major" Himalayish (in western Tibet, western India)
: ii. "minor" Himalayish (in Uttarakhand) » : iii. Dzorgai (in Sichuan) ?
: iv. Lepcha (in Sikkim) ? » : v. Magari (in Nepal) ?
II. Bahing-Vayu (a.k.a. Kiranti) (in Nepal) » A. Bahing
B. Khambu » C. Vayu-Chepang
D. Nepal Bhasa ?
III. Abor-Miri-Dafla (a.k.a. Mirish, North Assam) (in Sikkim, northern Assam)
IV. Kachin (in northern Myanmar)
V. Burmese-Lolo (a.k.a. Burmish) (in Sichuan, Yunnan, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam) » A. Burmese-Maru
B. Southern Lolo » C. Northern Lolo
D. Kanburi Lawa ( Kanchanaburi, Thailand) » E. Moso (a.k.a. Nakhi) (in western Yunnan)
F. Hsi-fan (in western Sichuan) » G. Tangut (in northwestern China)
H. Nung ?
VI. Bodo-Garo (a.k.a. Barish) {in northern Assam, northern Myanmar) » A. Bodo
B. Garo » : i. Garo A
: ii. Garo B » C. "Naked Naga" (a.k.a. Konyak) ?
D. Chairel ?
VII. Kuki-Naga (a.k.a. Kukish) (in southern Assam-Myanmar area) » A. Central Kuki
B. Northern Kuki » C. Old Kuki
D. Southern Kuki » E. Northern Naga
F. Southern Naga
In this classification,
- Bodish includes Tibetan, Gyarung, Takpa, Tsangla, Murmi, and Gurung;
- major Himalayish includes Kanauri, Chitkhuli, Thebor, Kanashi, Rangloi, Bunan, Manchati, Chamba Lahuli, and Zhang-zhung;
- minor Himalayish includes Rangkas, Darmiya, Chaudangsi, and Byangsi.
Dzorgai, Lepcha, and Magari seem to be most similar to the Tibetan-Kanauri branch. Lepcha may be a separate transitional branch like Kachin. Margari is also similar to Bahing-Vayu.
Bahing includes Sunwari, Dumi, Khaling, and Rai.
Khambu includes Sangpang, Nachereng, Rodong, Waling, Rungchengbung, Lambichong, Chingtang, Limbu, and Yakha.
Nepal Bhasa (Newari) shares similarities to both Bahing and Khambu. Aka (a.k.a. Hrusso) may belong to Abor-Miri-Dafla. Digaro, Miju, and Dhimal may also be Abor-Miri-Dafla, but this even more uncertain. Kachin seems to be a transitional branch containing features similar to all other branches. Kadu-Andro-Sengmai (a.k.a. Luish) and Taman may belong to Kachin.
Burmese-Maru includes Phön, Lashi, Atsi, and Achang.
Southern Lolo includes Phunoi, Akha, Lahu, Black Lolo, White Lolo, and Müng.
Northern Lolo includes Lisu, Ahi, Nyi, Lolopho, Chöko, Phupha, Ulu, and Independent Lolo.
Hsi-fan includes Manyak, Horpa, Menia, and Muli.
Nung may belong to Burmese-Lolo, but it also has similarities to Kachin. Pyu is similar to Nung.
Bodo includes Dimasa.
Naked Naga includes Banpara, Tableng, Namsang, Tamlu, Moshang, and Chang. Eastern languages of Naked Naga, although similar to Bodo-Garo, have similarities with Kachin.
Deori Chutiya (northern Assam) belongs to Bodo-Garo, although to which sub-group is uncertain.
Shafer (1966-1974)
Unlike Benedict (1972), Shafer's tentative classification doesn't separate Sino-Tibetan into two branches: Chinese and Tibeto-Burman. Rather, Chinese (Sinitic) is placed on the same level as Benedict's subgroupings of Tibeto-Burman.
Sino-Tibetan:
» I. Sinitic
» II. Daic
» III. Bodic
» IV. Burmic
» V. Baric
» VI. Karenic
Ethnologue
I. Bai
II. Himalayish » A. Mahakiranti
: i. Kham-Magar-Chepang-Sunwari » :: a. Chepang
:: b. Kham » :: c. Magar
:: d. Sunwari » : ii. Kiranti
:: a. Tomyang » :: b. Eastern
:: c. Western » : iii. Newar
B. Tibeto-Kanauri » : i. Dzalakha
: ii. Lepcha » : iii. Western Himalayish
: iv. Tibetic » :: a. Tshangla
:: b. Dhimal » :: c. Tamangic
:: d. Tibetan » C. Baima (unclassified)
III. Jingpho-Konyak-Bodo » A. Jingpho-Luish
B. Konyak-Bodo-Garo
IV. Karen » A. Pa’o
B. Zayein » C. Pwo
D. Sgaw-Bghai » : i. Bghai
: ii. Brek » : iii. Kayah
: iv. Sgaw » E. Zayein Karen (unclassified)
V. Kuki-Chin-Naga » A. Kuki-Chin
: i. Central » : ii. Northern
: iii. Southern » B. Naga
: i. Angami-Pochuri » : ii. Ao
: iii. Tangkhul » : iv. unclassified Naga
: v. Zeme
VI. Lolo-Burmese » A. Burmish
: i. Northern » : ii. Southern
: iii. unclassified Burmish » B. Loloish
: i. Northern » :: a. Lisu
:: b. Samei » :: c. Yi
: i. Southern » : ii. unclassified Loloish
C. Naxi » D. Phula (unclassified)
VII. Meitei
VIII. Mikir
IX. North Assam » A. Deng
B. Tani
X. Nungish
XI. Tangut-Qiang » A. Qiangic
B. rGyarong
XII. Tujia
XII. unclassified Tibeto-Burman
XIV. West Bodish
XV. MruFurther Information
Get more info on 'Tibeto-burman Languages'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://tibeto-burman_languages.totallyexplained.com">Tibeto-Burman languages Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
|
|